Yamaha R15 V5 VS Honda CBF1000F (2015)
Yamaha R15 V5 VS Honda CBF1000F (2015) Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
150 |
1000 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Sports |
Sports |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
|
2015 |
|
Brand Origin: |
|
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
liquid-cooled, single-cylinder engine |
In-line four, four-stroke |
|
Maximum Power |
18.15 |
103.66 |
|
Maximum Torque |
14.2 |
96 |
|
Bore |
|
75.0 Mm |
|
Stroke |
|
56.5 Mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
|
11.0:1 |
|
No of Cylinders |
|
4 |
|
Valves |
|
4 |
|
Fuel Supply |
EFI |
Injection |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
6 |
6 |
|
Clutch Type |
Assist And Slipper Clutch |
Info Not Available |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
|
Steel |
|
Front Suspension |
USD (Upside Down) forks |
41 mm cartridge-type telescopic fork |
|
Rear Suspension |
Linked-type monoshock |
Pro-Link with gas-charges HMAS damper |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Single Disc |
Dual Disc |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
220 mm |
240 Mm |
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
|
4 |
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
Dual-Channel |
No |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
Dual-Channel |
No |
|
Rear Tire Size |
140/70-17 |
160/60-ZR17 |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubeless |
tubetyre |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
1990 Mm |
2176 Mm |
|
Overall Width |
725 Mm |
|
|
Height |
1135 Mm |
1175 Mm |
|
Ground Clearance |
170 Mm |
135 Mm |
|
Weight |
142 kg |
250.0 kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
|
19.00 Litres |
|
Wheelbase |
1325 Mm |
1483 Mm |
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
mf |
Info-Not-Available |
|
Battery Voltage |
Info Not Available |
Info Not Available |
|
Head Light |
LED |
Halogen |
|
Tail Light |
led |
halogen |
|
Indicators |
led |
halogen |
Features
|
Speedometer |
digital |
digital |
|
Odometer |
digital |
digital |
|
RPM Meter |
Digital |
Digital |
|
Handle Type |
Three part handle bar |
Three part handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Split-Seat |
Split-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
yes |
no |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
yes |
no |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
-
2020-03-28 21:24:26 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
pulsar 150 vs suzuki gixxer which is better
-
2022-02-05 03:10:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Suzuki gixxer.
Yamaha SZ-RR VS Honda CB Trigger Comparison Review
-
2017-07-26 22:45:35 -
Saleh
Yamaha SZ-RR VS Honda CB Trigger Comparison Review
Livo VS Discover 110 VS Metro Plus VS Hayate Comparison
-
2020-02-20 01:25:04 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Honda-Livo VS Discover-110 VS TVS-Metro-Plus VS Suzuki-Hayate Feature Comparison
r15 v3 vs r15 v4 comparison
-
2022-02-10 03:07:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specs of both the r15 v3 and the r15 v4 model
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.