BSA Goldstar 650 VS Honda CM 400 1983
BSA Goldstar 650 VS Honda CM 400 1983 Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
650 |
400 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Cruiser |
Cruiser |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
|
1983 |
|
Brand Origin: |
|
Japan |
|
Made In: |
|
Japan |
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
|
|
|
Maximum Power |
45.6 |
42.11 |
|
Maximum Torque |
55 |
|
|
Bore |
100 mm |
|
|
Stroke |
83.0 mm |
|
|
Compression Ratio |
11.5:1 |
|
|
No of Cylinders |
|
|
|
Valves |
|
|
|
Fuel Supply |
|
Carburator |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
5 |
5 |
|
Clutch Type |
Wet-multiplate |
Info Not Available |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
Tubular Frame |
|
|
Front Suspension |
Telescopic hydraulic fork with cover tubes, 120 mm stroke |
Info Not Available |
|
Rear Suspension |
Twin Shock Absorbers with 5-step Adjustable Preload |
Info Not Available |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Single Disc |
Single Disc |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Drum Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
255 mm |
|
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
|
|
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
Dual-Channel |
No |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
Dual-Channel |
No |
|
Rear Tire Size |
150/70 - R17 |
4.60-16 |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubeless |
tubetyre |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
2206 Mm |
|
|
Overall Width |
817 Mm |
|
|
Height |
1093 Mm |
|
|
Ground Clearance |
150 Mm |
|
|
Weight |
201 kg |
184.0 kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
|
9.5 litres |
|
Wheelbase |
1425 Mm |
|
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
mf |
lead-acid |
|
Battery Voltage |
12V 5Ah |
12v |
|
Head Light |
LED |
Halogen |
|
Tail Light |
halogen |
halogen |
|
Indicators |
halogen |
halogen |
Features
|
Speedometer |
digital |
analog |
|
Odometer |
digital |
analog |
|
RPM Meter |
Digital |
Analog |
|
Handle Type |
Pipe handle bar |
Cruiser Type |
|
Seat Type |
Single-Seat |
Single-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
yes |
yes |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
Info-Not-Available |
no |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
-
2020-03-28 21:24:26 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
Motorcycle Tire - Tubed vs Tubeless Tire Advantage & Disadvantages
-
2019-09-15 02:59:37 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Choosing between tubed and tubeless motorcycle tires? Learn the advantages and disadvantages of each in our detailed guide on BikeBD.
Yamaha FZS-FI VS Fazer FI - Which To Choose & Why
-
2017-12-08 22:29:41 -
Saleh
Yamaha FZS-FI VS Fazer FI - Which To Choose & Why
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.
pulsar 150 vs pulsar 150 neon difference
-
2022-02-02 02:17:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Bajaj Pulsar 150.
r15 v3 vs cbr 150r
-
2022-02-05 06:29:00 -
imran
The Yamaha R15 V3 and Honda CBR 150R, both 150cc sports bikes, face off. Despite similar prices and mileage, the CBR 150R stands out with a powerful engine and dual-channel ABS, making it a versatile choice