BMW S 1000 R VS Keeway Benda LFC 700
BMW S 1000 R VS Keeway Benda LFC 700 Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
1000 |
650 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Naked Sports |
Naked Sports |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
|
|
|
Brand Origin: |
|
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
Water/Oil-cooled 4-cylinder 4-stroke In-line Engine, Four Valves per Cylinder, Two Overhead Camshafts |
4-Cylinder/4-Stroke/16-Valves |
|
Maximum Power |
162.74 |
75 |
|
Maximum Torque |
114 |
67 |
|
Bore |
80 Mm |
|
|
Stroke |
49.7 Mm |
|
|
Compression Ratio |
12.5 :1 |
|
|
No of Cylinders |
4 |
4 |
|
Valves |
|
|
|
Fuel Supply |
|
Fuel Injection |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
5 |
6 |
|
Clutch Type |
Info Not Available |
Wet-multiplate |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
Bridge-type aluminium laminate frame with load-bearing engine |
|
|
Front Suspension |
Upside-down telescopic fork with a diameter of 45 mm, spring preload and adjustable rebound and compression stage, 120 m |
Telescopic USD |
|
Rear Suspension |
Aluminium underbeam swinging arm, Full-Floater Pro, central shock absorber, adjustable rebound and compression damping a |
Monoshock |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Dual Disc |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
|
|
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
4 |
4 |
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
Info-Not-Available |
Dual-Channel |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
Info-Not-Available |
Dual-Channel |
|
Rear Tire Size |
190/55 ZR 17 |
180/55-17 |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubeless |
tubeless |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
2090 Mm |
|
|
Overall Width |
812 Mm |
|
|
Height |
1115 Mm |
|
|
Ground Clearance |
|
|
|
Weight |
199 kg |
226 Kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
16.5 L |
18L |
|
Wheelbase |
1450 Mm |
|
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
mf |
mf |
|
Battery Voltage |
12 V, 8 Ah |
12v |
|
Head Light |
LED |
LED |
|
Tail Light |
led |
led |
|
Indicators |
led |
led |
Features
|
Speedometer |
digital |
digital |
|
Odometer |
digital |
digital |
|
RPM Meter |
Digital |
Digital |
|
Handle Type |
Pipe handle bar |
Pipe handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Split-Seat |
Single-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
yes |
Info-Not-Available |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
yes |
yes |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
Yamaha RX 115 to Yamaha R15 v.2 : The Yamaha Revolution
-
2013-02-05 10:27:11 -
Shuvo
It is a Yamaha RX 115 which I personally think is one of best bike that ever touched the tarmac of Bengal. Debuted n 1981 & was into production for 20 year
Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Tvs Apache 150 RTR : A Comparison
-
2012-12-07 01:36:25 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Tvs Apache 150 RTR :A Comparison
Keeway RKS 100 VS Dayang Runner Bullet 100 Comparison Review
-
2017-10-03 21:39:56 -
Saleh
Keeway RKS 100 VS Dayang Runner Bullet 100 Comparison Review
Yamaha FZS vs Tvs Apache RTR 150:A Comparative Review
-
2013-01-24 10:24:11 -
Shuvo
With the Yamaha FZS vs Tvs Apache RTR 150 local market scene getting hotter and more intense by the day. People are becoming more and more confused as there
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.
Motorcycle Fuel Economy VS Build Quality - Which Is Preferable?
-
2018-01-31 23:32:47 -
Ashik Mahmud
Motorcycle Fuel Economy VS Build Quality - Which Is Preferable?