Bajaj Pulsar 200 NS (2012) VS Honda CBF125 (2010)
Bajaj Pulsar 200 NS (2012) VS Honda CBF125 (2010) Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
|
125 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Standard |
Standard |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
2012 |
2010 |
|
Brand Origin: |
bajaj |
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
Single cylinder, four-stroke |
Single cylinder, four-stroke |
|
Maximum Power |
23.07 |
10.86 |
|
Maximum Torque |
18.3 |
11.2 |
|
Bore |
72.0 Mm |
52.4 Mm |
|
Stroke |
49.0 Mm |
57.8 Mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
|
9.2:1 |
|
No of Cylinders |
1 |
1 |
|
Valves |
4 valve per cylinders |
|
|
Fuel Supply |
Carburator |
Carburetor |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
6 |
5 |
|
Clutch Type |
Info Not Available |
Wet-multiplate |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
Pressed steel Perimeter Frame |
|
|
Front Suspension |
Telescopic Front Fork with Antifriction Bush Dia 37 |
30mm telescopic fork, 115mm axle travel |
|
Rear Suspension |
Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with piggy back gas canister |
Conventional twin shock, double tube damper with 3-step adjustable spring preload, 87mm axle travel |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Single Disc |
Single Disc |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Drum Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
230Mm |
|
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
1 |
1 |
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
No |
No |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
No |
No |
|
Rear Tire Size |
130/70-17 |
100/90-M17 |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubetyre |
tubetyre |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
2017 Mm |
1955 Mm |
|
Overall Width |
804 Mm |
760 Mm |
|
Height |
1195 Mm |
1110 Mm |
|
Ground Clearance |
167 Mm |
173 Mm |
|
Weight |
145.0 kg |
128.0 kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
12.00 Litres |
13.00 litres |
|
Wheelbase |
1363 Mm |
1270 Mm |
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
Info-Not-Available |
mf |
|
Battery Voltage |
Info Not Available |
12v |
|
Head Light |
LED |
LED |
|
Tail Light |
led |
halogen |
|
Indicators |
led |
halogen |
Features
|
Speedometer |
analog |
digital |
|
Odometer |
analog |
digital |
|
RPM Meter |
Analog |
Analog |
|
Handle Type |
Pipe handle bar |
Pipe handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Split-Seat |
Split-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
no |
yes |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
no |
yes |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
Lifan KPR150 VS KPR165-FI VS KPR165-Carb Feature Comparison
-
2020-01-26 01:01:32 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Lifan KPR150 VS KPR165-FI VS KPR165-Carb Feature Comparison
Yamaha R15 V3 VS Suzuki GSX-R150 VS Honda CBR150R Comparison Review
-
2017-10-13 20:27:52 -
Saleh
Yamaha R15 V3 VS Suzuki GSX-R150 VS Honda CBR150R Comparison Review
Yamaha FZS-FI VS Fazer FI - Which To Choose & Why
-
2017-12-08 22:29:41 -
Saleh
Yamaha FZS-FI VS Fazer FI - Which To Choose & Why
Yamaha YZF R15 Version 2.0 VS Version 3.0 Comparison Review
-
2017-08-01 03:17:47 -
Saleh
Yamaha YZF R15 Version 2.0 VS Version 3.0 Comparison Review
Motorcycle Fuel Economy VS Build Quality - Which Is Preferable?
-
2018-01-31 23:32:47 -
Ashik Mahmud
Motorcycle Fuel Economy VS Build Quality - Which Is Preferable?
Keeway RKS 100 VS Dayang Runner Bullet 100 Comparison Review
-
2017-10-03 21:39:56 -
Saleh
Keeway RKS 100 VS Dayang Runner Bullet 100 Comparison Review