Yamaha WR 400 F 2000 VS BMW G 650 GS
Yamaha WR 400 F 2000 VS BMW G 650 GS Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
400 |
650 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Dirt Bike |
Dirt Bike |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
2000 |
|
|
Brand Origin: |
Japan |
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
Single cylinder, four-stroke |
single-cylinder, 4-stroke engine |
|
Maximum Power |
|
47.3 |
|
Maximum Torque |
|
60 |
|
Bore |
|
|
|
Stroke |
|
Four-stroke |
|
Compression Ratio |
|
11.5: 1 |
|
No of Cylinders |
|
1 |
|
Valves |
|
4 |
|
Fuel Supply |
Carburettor |
Fuel Injection |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Info-Not-Available |
|
No of Gears |
5 |
5 |
|
Clutch Type |
Wet-multiplate |
Wet multi-disc clutc |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
|
Bridge-type steel section frame |
|
Front Suspension |
Info Not Available |
Telescopic fork, Ø 41 mm, fork stabiliser |
|
Rear Suspension |
Info Not Availlable |
Box-section steel dual swing arm |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Single Disc |
Single Disc |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
|
240 mm |
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
|
1 |
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
No |
Yes |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
No |
Yes |
|
Rear Tire Size |
|
130/80 R17 65S |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubetyre |
Info-Not-Available |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
|
2185 mm |
|
Overall Width |
|
920 mm |
|
Height |
|
|
|
Ground Clearance |
|
|
|
Weight |
105.5 kg |
177 kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
5.30 Litres |
|
|
Wheelbase |
|
|
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
lead-acid |
Info-Not-Available |
|
Battery Voltage |
12V 3Ah |
12v |
|
Head Light |
Halogen |
Info Not Available |
|
Tail Light |
halogen |
Info-Not-Available |
|
Indicators |
halogen |
Info-Not-Available |
Features
|
Speedometer |
analog |
samidigital |
|
Odometer |
analog |
Info-Not-Available |
|
RPM Meter |
Analog |
Info-Not-Available |
|
Handle Type |
Pipe handle bar |
Pipe handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Single-Seat |
singleseat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
no |
yes |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
no |
Info-Not-Available |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
Yamaha FZS-FI VS Fazer FI - Which To Choose & Why
-
2017-12-08 22:29:41 -
Saleh
Yamaha FZS-FI VS Fazer FI - Which To Choose & Why
pulsar 150 vs suzuki gixxer which is better
-
2022-02-05 03:10:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Suzuki gixxer.
Honda Dream Neo VS Honda Livo 110 Comparison Review
-
2018-05-05 20:50:50 -
Ashik Mahmud
Honda Dream Neo VS Honda Livo 110 Comparison Review
r15 v3 vs r15m
-
2022-01-30 07:27:00 -
imran
For detailed information on the Yamaha R15 V3 and Yamaha R15M, visit their official product pages, including features, technical specifications, and pricing.
Honda CB Shine 125 VS Bajaj Discover 125 Comparison Review
-
2017-07-15 03:23:19 -
Saleh
These days Honda CB Shine 125 & Bajaj Discover 125 are doing nice in our market. So here is our Honda CB Shine 125 VS Bajaj Discover 125 Comparison Review.
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.